Sunday, September 23. 2007

Resident Evil 3 was not as crappy as it could have been

Just got home from Resident Evil: Extinction.

I don't have a lot to say, other than: "a bit suckier than Resident Evil, but nowhere near as sucky as Resident Evil: Apocalypse."

Bonus points for creatively using Marylin Manson's theme from the first one in a multitude of different versions throughout this one. I liked that a lot.

It's amazing to me how everyone who survives apocalypses of a global magnitude always has such perfect skin and teeth and are all hot as hell. I guess those of us with inferior genes are more susceptible to being left to die. I guess it's time to start compensating for that by stockpiling shotguns and ammunition.

Defined tags for this entry: , , ,
Related entries by tags:

Posted by jer@nyquil.org at 15:59





blog comments powered by Disqus

Pre-Disqus Comments:

2007-09-23 18:26
marcus132 said:

I really liked the first two, but I can't remember a single specific detail about either of them.

I'm pretty sure there was an underground umbrella factory or something, and then there was this hot chick wearing a costume made of orange rubber belts.

Do I need to do some studying before I see the third one, or am I pretty much good?

#1
2007-09-23 19:14
jer said:

You'll be fine. There's a clever little recap at the beginning.

#1.1
2007-09-23 19:45
aerospace said:

besides that stuff, this is all you need to know:

"STAAAAAAAAARS." there wasn't much more to the second one than that.

#1.2
2007-09-23 19:50
aerospace said:

i haven't seen it, nor do i have plans to. in fact i only saw the second one because it was a freebie from my old job. i don't even know if i've seen the first one.

anyway, your comment about perfect skin and teeth... isn't ali larter in this? how do you explain her face that's pulled too tight and her giant teeth she's always showing off? she's just barely human enough not to be mistaken for a mutant most of the time in Heroes.

in any case, i don't like ali larter. at all. does it show?

#2
2007-09-24 09:07
Jer said:

point taken.

I meant "white and straight" when I said "perfect," and didnt take largeness or tightness into account.

#2.1
~

Quicksearch

About the Author

jer@nyquil.org

The author lives in Vancouver, Washington, USA with his girlfriend and a menagerie of cats, rats, fish, birds, guinea pigs and robots.

Among other inanities, he strives to use investigative techniques to work young starlet breasts into every aspect of rational discourse -- focusing on the discourse, thus making it not perverted. Also, has recently begun a career as "Internet hairstylist."

He can be contacted via email and Jabber IM at 'jer@nyquil.org'. He likes to be contacted.

(All press inquiries, however, ought be directed towards the author's agent, Alistair Hoel, via email to ahoel@nyquil.org.)

Winner* of Sean Gleeson's Researcher of the Century Award.

*: I've technically only earned 5/6ths of the award, but maintain that I deserve the whole thing.

Show tagged entries