nyquil.org - Comments

jer@nyquil.org: they can't BOTH be true...

nospam@example.com (jer@nyquil.org) — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:58:27 -0800

ah, crap. I forgot that I hardcoded HTML support into this blog software; a recent upgrade hosed it. Geez.

Paranormal Podcast, episode 37:
http://paranormalpodcast.com/index.php?post_id=370355

jer@nyquil.org: they can't BOTH be true...

nospam@example.com (jer@nyquil.org) — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:55:54 -0800

21:46, 17:45

Paranormal Podcast, episode 37.
(Direct link to audio: http://media.libsyn.com/media/paranormalpodcast/Haunted_US_Battlefields_-_Paranormal_Podcast_37.mp3)

The Alamo section starts at about 17:45, and the basement is off-handedly mentioned at 17:45.

The whole show is pretty interesting, but the guest seems unsure of what’s actually in her book, so I’m not sure she’s the best source. But still…

jer@nyquil.org: Hacking Google: my further adventures with Android

nospam@example.com (jer@nyquil.org) — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:51:52 -0800

Indeed. I’ve been following OpenMoko since its inception, and find it a really exciting platform.

They’ve made great headway in getting Android running on their various revisions of handset, and I’m seriously considering picking up one just to tinker.

Android is a wonderful platform, but the locking-down that T-Mobile/Google are trying to enforce is kind of irritating. Installing Android on OpenMoko would be truly free and open.

Hazel Jones: hack hack hack

nospam@example.com (Hazel Jones) — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:38:35 -0800

Hi,

I’m Hazel Jones and I work in a company interested in blog advertising. I found your blog engaging and I’m contacting you to ask if you are interested in blog post sponsorship.

If you are interested, kindly mail back at k5sino@bigstring.com, indicating your blog for reference, and I’ll send you back pricing details, guidelines and processes. Looking forward to doing business with you.

Sincerely,

Hazel Jones

greatbiggary: Hacking Google: my further adventures with Android

nospam@example.com (greatbiggary) — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:04:21 -0800

I’m curious. Would you be open to something like [url=http://www.openmoko.com/]Openmoko[/url]? I’d love to see more support and hype for things like it, the GP32 and [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GP2X]GP2X[/url], and the [url=http://www.xgamestation.com/browse_products.php?category=2]XGameStation[/url] stuff.

marcus132: they can't BOTH be true...

nospam@example.com (marcus132) — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:10:32 -0800

Source!

aerospace: Junkbuster Compromised?

nospam@example.com (aerospace) — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:32:55 -0800

thanks for all the spam, jerkwad!

koph: Parker Posey Has a Posse

nospam@example.com (koph) — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:34:12 -0700

parker posey > all

Steven Klassen: Politics: Rock the Vote

nospam@example.com (Steven Klassen) — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:37:10 -0700

That’s awesome, man.

Johnathan F. Perdus: Politics: Rock the Vote

nospam@example.com (Johnathan F. Perdus) — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:31:24 -0700

Additionally, I would join a group that wanted to over throw the government to “reboot” it (I really hate that phrase). I personally think some major changes need to be made to how our government is run in order to try and cut down on the amount of corruption that is found in our current system.

While I realize human nature will always be the major failing point in the system, hopefully we could come up with a way to minimize that little problem.

Johnathan F. Perdus: Politics: Rock the Vote

nospam@example.com (Johnathan F. Perdus) — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:21:39 -0700

I agree but really what is the point anymore? Our vote really does not seem to count. It seems like the whole system is rigged and the winner is already selected. Even if your choice does win, they often don’t follow the will of the people that supposedly put them in power but instead go with the wants of whomever has the biggest check.

Am I going to vote? No. Am I going to whine about the the outcome of things? No, it accomplishes about as much as voting.

Laura: Debunkery: I demonstrate how Emma Watson's Boobs Were NOT Altered for the IMAX Poster

nospam@example.com (Laura) — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:36:18 -0700

It certainly was shopped, not only is the breast enhanced, but the hair was also to make it more frazzled. if the angle was eschewed as suggested the face angles would also change and they have not.

By the way I happen to be one of the people THAT DO NOT always call something shopped, but this is.

think about it: Debunkery: I demonstrate how Emma Watson's Boobs Were NOT Altered for the IMAX Poster

nospam@example.com (think about it) — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:32:24 -0700

The group was not photographed together, adjusting the camera angle would have affected how the other people in the picture looked, but because each character was most likely photographed individualy, we wont notice it. Look at Emma’s hair in both pictures, different? two different photos, taken at different angles.

jer@nyquil.org: Religulous Review

nospam@example.com (jer@nyquil.org) — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:33:26 -0700

well, I just think it’s kind of a dick move to just out and make fun of someone you’re pretending to have an intellectual discussion with.

Steven Klassen: Religulous Review

nospam@example.com (Steven Klassen) — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:05:46 -0700

Aw, it’s not douchery. Well, maybe it is, but it’s damn funny. Maybe I’d think it more of the douchey variety if he were making fun of someone I liked.